Back to Blog
Jobs to Be DoneB2B SaaSEnerpriseCustomer Research Frameworks

Jobs to Be Done for SaaS: A Complete Implementation Guide

In the fast-paced world of SaaS development, it's easy to get caught up in the feature race. But here's a stark reality: 70% of SaaS features go unused or underutilized. Why? Because we're often building what we think customers want, rather than understanding what jobs they're really hiring our software to do.

"The truth is, no one wants to use your software. They want to achieve an outcome that your software enables."

What is Jobs to Be Done in SaaS Context?

The Jobs to Be Done (JTBD) framework, first popularized by Clayton Christensen at Harvard Business School, takes on special significance in SaaS. Unlike physical products, software solutions often serve multiple jobs simultaneously, across different user types and organizational levels. This multi-layered nature of SaaS jobs makes it essential to understand the complete hierarchy of needs your software fulfills.

Traditional SaaS Development vs. JTBD Approach

Traditional SaaS development often focuses heavily on feature lists and functionality, leading to bloated products that miss the mark on core user needs. Teams spend countless hours building features that directly mirror competitor offerings, rather than understanding the unique progress their customers are trying to make. This feature-first mindset results in products that are comprehensive in capability but often fall short in delivering meaningful outcomes.

In contrast, the JTBD approach fundamentally shifts the focus to understanding the progress customers want to make in their specific circumstances. Instead of starting with features, JTBD-oriented teams begin by deeply understanding the situations that cause customers to seek new solutions. This progress-first thinking leads to more focused, effective products that solve real problems rather than simply matching feature sets.

The shift from user stories based on roles to stories based on circumstances and desired outcomes is particularly crucial in SaaS. While traditional user stories might focus on what a "marketing manager" or "developer" does with the software, JTBD stories capture the specific situations that trigger the need for a solution and the desired outcome the user wants to achieve. This approach helps teams build features that directly enable customer progress rather than simply adding capabilities that match a role description.

Real-World Examples of SaaS Jobs to Be Done

Slack's True Job

While Slack appears on the surface to be a team communication tool, deeper JTBD analysis reveals it serves several crucial organizational and social functions. In remote and hybrid environments, Slack is hired to maintain team cohesion by creating virtual spaces that mirror physical office interactions. This job goes far beyond simple message transmission. It's about fostering a sense of connection and belonging in digital-first companies.

The platform's true value lies in its ability to reduce email overload while simultaneously maintaining a searchable record of organizational knowledge. Teams hire Slack to create a more dynamic, accessible form of institutional memory. The informal nature of Slack conversations, combined with powerful search and organization features, helps teams build and maintain culture through daily interactions that would be impossible or awkward through traditional email channels.

Zoom's Evolution

Zoom's success story provides a masterclass in understanding and executing on true customer jobs. While competitors focused on adding features and integrations, Zoom recognized that their core job wasn't simply "video conferencing" but "enabling seamless human connection at a distance." This subtle but crucial distinction drove every aspect of their product development.

By focusing on this core job, Zoom prioritized reliability and ease of use over feature abundance. They understood that the emotional job of feeling confidently connected was more important than having numerous advanced features. This insight led them to invest heavily in infrastructure and simplicity, ensuring that even non-technical users could successfully "hire" Zoom to connect with others without friction or frustration.

The Four Forces of SaaS Progress

Push of the Situation

The push factors in SaaS adoption are often complex and interrelated. Scaling challenges frequently emerge as organizations grow, revealing the limitations of existing solutions. These might manifest as performance issues, workflow bottlenecks, or inability to handle increased data volumes. Technical debt accumulates in legacy systems, making them increasingly expensive and difficult to maintain, while also limiting an organization's ability to adapt to new market demands.

Rising costs become particularly acute as organizations scale, especially when dealing with solutions that weren't designed for enterprise-level usage. This isn't just about license fees – it includes the hidden costs of maintaining workarounds, managing multiple tools to accomplish what should be simple tasks, and lost productivity due to system limitations. Team friction often emerges when existing tools fail to support evolving work patterns, particularly in remote or hybrid environments where seamless collaboration is essential.

Pull of the New Solution

The attraction to new SaaS solutions often centers around innovative capabilities that address previously unmet needs. These might include advanced automation features, AI-powered insights, or novel approaches to common problems. However, it's also about the promise of better outcomes and improved ways of working.

Integration capabilities play a crucial role in the pull factor, particularly as organizations seek to streamline their tech stacks and reduce context switching. Solutions that offer robust, well-documented APIs and pre-built integrations with popular tools can significantly reduce implementation barriers. Modern user experiences that align with contemporary design patterns and user expectations create an emotional pull, making users feel more professional and efficient in their work.

Anxiety of Change

Data migration concerns often top the list of anxieties when considering new SaaS solutions. Organizations worry about data loss, format compatibility, and maintaining historical records. This anxiety extends beyond just the technical aspects of moving data – it includes concerns about maintaining data integrity, compliance requirements, and ensuring business continuity during the transition.

Team training requirements present another significant source of anxiety. Organizations must consider not just the direct costs of training but also the productivity dip that often accompanies new tool adoption. Integration complexity can paralyze decision-making, particularly when dealing with mission-critical systems that cannot afford downtime or disruption. ROI uncertainty looms large, especially for solutions that require significant upfront investment in time and resources before delivering value.

Habits of the Present

Existing workflows represent one of the strongest forces against change in SaaS adoption. Teams develop intricate processes around their current tools, often creating complex workarounds that become deeply embedded in daily operations. While these workflows might not be optimal, they're familiar and predictable, making them difficult to abandon.

Team familiarity with existing tools creates a form of organizational muscle memory that resists change. This includes not just knowledge of features but also established communication patterns, troubleshooting procedures, and informal best practices that have evolved over time. Sunk costs, both financial and psychological, can make organizations reluctant to consider alternatives, even when current solutions are clearly inadequate.

Conducting Effective JTBD Research in SaaS

Effective JTBD research in SaaS requires a systematic approach to customer interviews and data analysis. The key is to focus on specific moments of choice – when customers actively decided to seek out, purchase, or switch to a new solution. These moments reveal the true jobs that customers are hiring software to perform.

Recent adopters provide crucial insights into current market needs and decision factors. Their experiences are fresh, and they can clearly articulate the challenges that drove them to seek a new solution. Power users who have recently expanded their usage offer valuable perspectives on how jobs evolve as organizations become more sophisticated in their use of a solution.

Customer churn episodes, while potentially uncomfortable to examine, offer invaluable insights into unmet or poorly served jobs. Understanding why customers choose competitor solutions helps identify gaps in your current offering and reveals jobs you might be overlooking or underserving.

Free Resource:

Download our SaaS-specific JTBD interview guide, including our proven 100 question toolkit, sample transcript, and response evaluation guide. Get it here.

Implementing JTBD in Your Development Process

The implementation of JTBD in SaaS development requires a fundamental shift in how teams approach product strategy and feature development. The process begins with comprehensive customer research, analyzing not just direct feedback but also support conversations, sales calls, and user behavior data to identify patterns and understand the full context of customer jobs.

Job statements need to be crafted with precision, capturing not just the functional aspects of what customers are trying to achieve, but also the emotional and social dimensions of their desired progress. A well-crafted job statement follows the format "When I [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [desired outcome]." This structure ensures that teams understand not just what customers are doing, but why they're doing it and what success looks like for them.

The development phase requires careful alignment between identified jobs and feature development. This means prioritizing features based not on technical complexity or market trends, but on their ability to help customers make progress in their most important jobs. Success metrics need to be redefined around job completion rather than traditional usage metrics, focusing on how effectively customers are achieving their desired outcomes.

Measuring Success Through Jobs

Traditional SaaS metrics take on new meaning when viewed through the JTBD lens. Feature adoption becomes less about how many users have clicked a button and more about how many have successfully completed their intended job. Time spent in the application shifts from being a vanity metric to a measure of job efficiency – how quickly and effectively can users achieve their desired outcomes?

Net Promoter Score (NPS) transforms from a generic satisfaction metric to a job satisfaction score, measuring how effectively your solution helps customers make progress in their key jobs. This reframing helps teams focus on meaningful improvements rather than superficial feature additions.

AI-Powered Tools for JTBD Research

While the Jobs to Be Done framework provides invaluable insights, traditionally implementing it has required significant expertise and resources. The emergence of AI-powered research tools is democratizing access to JTBD methodology, allowing teams to conduct comprehensive research without extensive training in interview techniques or analysis.

Automating JTBD Interviews with AI

AI voice agents, such as those provided by Resonant, are transforming how teams conduct JTBD research. These tools can conduct consistent, unbiased interviews at scale, solving several critical challenges in traditional JTBD implementation:

Interview consistency has always been a major challenge in JTBD research. Human interviewers, even when well-trained, can inadvertently introduce bias or miss crucial follow-up questions. AI voice agents maintain perfect consistency across hundreds or thousands of interviews, ensuring that every customer interaction follows proven JTBD interviewing principles. They systematically explore the functional, emotional, and social dimensions of jobs while adapting their questioning based on customer responses.

The ability to conduct interviews at scale is another transformative benefit. Traditional JTBD research often relied on small sample sizes due to the time-intensive nature of human-led interviews. AI voice agents can conduct hundreds of interviews simultaneously, providing a much broader and more representative view of customer jobs. This scale helps teams identify patterns and jobs that might be missed in smaller sample sizes.

Pattern Recognition and Analysis

Beyond conducting interviews, AI excels at analyzing large volumes of conversation data to identify patterns and insights. The technology can process interview transcripts to identify common themes, emotional triggers, and unexpected jobs that customers are hiring products to perform. This automated analysis helps teams move from raw interview data to actionable insights much faster than traditional manual analysis methods.

AI tools can also track how jobs evolve over time by analyzing longitudinal data from customer interviews. This temporal analysis helps teams anticipate emerging jobs and adapt their products proactively rather than reactively. The technology can identify subtle shifts in how customers describe their needs and challenges, providing early indicators of evolving market requirements.

Implementing AI-Powered JTBD Research

Getting started with AI-powered JTBD research is straightforward. Modern platforms handle the technical complexity of AI implementation, allowing teams to focus on defining their research objectives and interpreting results. The process typically involves:

First, teams define their target customer segments and research objectives. The AI system can then be configured to conduct interviews using proven JTBD questioning techniques, automatically adapting its approach based on customer responses while maintaining consistent focus on uncovering true jobs to be done.

During the interview process, AI voice agents engage in natural conversation while systematically exploring the circumstances, motivations, and desired outcomes that drive customer behavior. The technology captures not just what customers say, but also patterns in how they describe their challenges and aspirations.

After interviews are completed, AI analysis tools process the data to identify patterns and insights. Teams receive structured reports highlighting key jobs, common switching triggers, and emerging opportunities. This automated analysis dramatically reduces the time required to move from raw interview data to actionable insights.

Real-Time Adaptation and Learning

One of the most powerful aspects of AI-powered JTBD research is the ability to adapt in real-time based on emerging patterns. As the system conducts more interviews, it becomes increasingly adept at identifying promising lines of inquiry and exploring them in detail. This adaptive capability helps ensure that research efforts remain focused on the most valuable insights while still maintaining the systematic rigor required for effective JTBD research.

Additional Resources:

Become a Member.

Stay on top of your customer base with Resonant articles in your inbox. No fluff, no spam.